User:Aleksejrs/ideas/federation - Revision history

Aleksejrs: /* Selective media copying */ new location of the ticket

2013-06-25T15:44:37Z

Selective media copying: new location of the ticket

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:44, 25 June 2013
Line 11:		Line 11:
	* The result should (must at least if the source is non-public) be marked private by default.		* The result should (must at least if the source is non-public) be marked private by default.
	* It should be possible for the result to have a visible reference to its source.		* It should be possible for the result to have a visible reference to its source.
	* ServerB may be notified of the copying, so that it can link to the result, if it chooses to (http://bugs.foocorp.net/issues/604).		* ServerB may be notified of the copying, so that it can link to the result, if it chooses to ([http://issues.mediagoblin.org/ticket/268 #268], migrated from http://bugs.foocorp.net/issues/604).

	=== Another use-case ===		=== Another use-case ===

Willkg: Reverted edits by KaitlinDudley (talk) to last revision by Aleksejrs

2012-01-03T15:01:33Z

Reverted edits by KaitlinDudley (talk) to last revision by Aleksejrs

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:01, 3 January 2012
Line 22:		Line 22:
	Here is a StatusNet feature request that came to be after the discussion: http://status.net/open-source/issues/3407		Here is a StatusNet feature request that came to be after the discussion: http://status.net/open-source/issues/3407

	# GMG has a concept of something like “groups” (as of this writing it probably does not yet). The process of [http://www.marvelousessays.com essay writing] will be much easier with MarvelousEssays.Com as there are a lot of highly professional and talented writers who are always eager to help you out with any sort of academic assignments regardless of the complexity levels. I do know what I�m talking about! Imagine groups like in Identi.ca — see the link above.		# GMG has a concept of something like “groups” (as of this writing it probably does not yet). Imagine groups like in Identi.ca — see the link above.
	# A group originates at ServerA, and is also at ServerB.		# A group originates at ServerA, and is also at ServerB.
	# When somebody at ServerA or ServerB posts a media into the group (or marks it as being in that group), it appears in the group at both ServerA and ServerB.		# When somebody at ServerA or ServerB posts a media into the group (or marks it as being in that group), it appears in the group at both ServerA and ServerB.

KaitlinDudley at 14:48, 3 January 2012

2012-01-03T14:48:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:48, 3 January 2012
Line 22:		Line 22:
	Here is a StatusNet feature request that came to be after the discussion: http://status.net/open-source/issues/3407		Here is a StatusNet feature request that came to be after the discussion: http://status.net/open-source/issues/3407

	# GMG has a concept of something like “groups” (as of this writing it probably does not yet). Imagine groups like in Identi.ca — see the link above.		# GMG has a concept of something like “groups” (as of this writing it probably does not yet). The process of [http://www.marvelousessays.com essay writing] will be much easier with MarvelousEssays.Com as there are a lot of highly professional and talented writers who are always eager to help you out with any sort of academic assignments regardless of the complexity levels. I do know what I�m talking about! Imagine groups like in Identi.ca — see the link above.
	# A group originates at ServerA, and is also at ServerB.		# A group originates at ServerA, and is also at ServerB.
	# When somebody at ServerA or ServerB posts a media into the group (or marks it as being in that group), it appears in the group at both ServerA and ServerB.		# When somebody at ServerA or ServerB posts a media into the group (or marks it as being in that group), it appears in the group at both ServerA and ServerB.

Aleksejrs: /* FidoNet-inspired group mirroring */ + pre-moderation on each node

2011-11-12T21:38:17Z

FidoNet-inspired group mirroring: + pre-moderation on each node

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:38, 12 November 2011
Line 27:		Line 27:

	* A group may have a moderator.		* A group may have a moderator.
	* A server admin may refuse a media to be on his server.		* A server admin may refuse a media to be on his server (including: pre-moderation).
	* ServerC may receive this group even from a server other than the one from where the group originates, or from where the file originates.		* ServerC may receive this group even from a server other than the one from where the group originates, or from where the file originates.
	** Bad: that might create a moderatorless version of the group at a group of servers, or similar MITM attacks on the group, but that’s its decentralization, and it is optional.		** Bad: that might create a moderatorless version of the group at a group of servers, or similar MITM attacks on the group, but that’s its decentralization, and it is optional.

Aleksejrs: API

2011-11-08T20:44:54Z

API

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:44, 8 November 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
			It may be that things described here are described, and better described, at [[API]]. --[[User:Aleksejrs\|Aleksejrs]] 15:44, 8 November 2011 (EST)

	== Selective media copying ==		== Selective media copying ==

Aleksejrs: moved User:Aleksejrs/ideas to User:Aleksejrs/ideas/federation

2011-11-08T20:43:08Z

moved User:Aleksejrs/ideas to User:Aleksejrs/ideas/federation

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:43, 8 November 2011
(No difference)

Aleksejrs: /* Selective media copying */ correction

2011-09-27T10:21:39Z

Selective media copying: correction

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:21, 27 September 2011
Line 6:		Line 6:
	# ServerA fetches the image from ServerB with all metadata, so it becomes available at ServerA.		# ServerA fetches the image from ServerB with all metadata, so it becomes available at ServerA.

	* Access (both viewing and copying) to the image might require ~~authentification~~.		* Access (both viewing and copying) to the image might require view/access rights.
	* The result should (must at least if ~~authentification~~ ~~was~~ ~~required~~) be marked private by default.		* The result should (must at least if the source is non-public) be marked private by default.
	* It should be possible for the result to have a visible reference to its source.		* It should be possible for the result to have a visible reference to its source.
	* ServerB may be notified of the copying, so that it can link to the result, if it chooses to (http://bugs.foocorp.net/issues/604).		* ServerB may be notified of the copying, so that it can link to the result, if it chooses to (http://bugs.foocorp.net/issues/604).

Aleksejrs: /* FidoNet-inspired group mirroring */ ++

2011-09-26T11:06:41Z

FidoNet-inspired group mirroring: ++

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:06, 26 September 2011
Line 18:		Line 18:
	== FidoNet-inspired group mirroring ==		== FidoNet-inspired group mirroring ==

	~~To be written.~~ Here is a StatusNet feature request that came to be after the discussion: http://status.net/open-source/issues/3407		Here is a StatusNet feature request that came to be after the discussion: http://status.net/open-source/issues/3407

			# GMG has a concept of something like “groups” (as of this writing it probably does not yet). Imagine groups like in Identi.ca — see the link above.
			# A group originates at ServerA, and is also at ServerB.
			# When somebody at ServerA or ServerB posts a media into the group (or marks it as being in that group), it appears in the group at both ServerA and ServerB.

			* A group may have a moderator.
			* A server admin may refuse a media to be on his server.
			* ServerC may receive this group even from a server other than the one from where the group originates, or from where the file originates.
			** Bad: that might create a moderatorless version of the group at a group of servers, or similar MITM attacks on the group, but that’s its decentralization, and it is optional.
			** Bad: a complex network of servers can have broken links (or worse, recreate FidoNet politics!).
			* To protect the group against broken links, servers may connect to each other as a ring, downloading only the files they don’t have (keeping information about where the file comes from, to be able to remove files/versions coming from a particular server?).

Aleksejrs: /* Selective media copying */ http://bugs.foocorp.net/issues/604

2011-09-26T10:28:18Z

Selective media copying: http://bugs.foocorp.net/issues/604

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:28, 26 September 2011
Line 9:		Line 9:
	* The result should (must at least if authentification was required) be marked private by default.		* The result should (must at least if authentification was required) be marked private by default.
	* It should be possible for the result to have a visible reference to its source.		* It should be possible for the result to have a visible reference to its source.
	* ServerB may be notified of the copying, so that it can link to the result, if it chooses to.		* ServerB may be notified of the copying, so that it can link to the result, if it chooses to (http://bugs.foocorp.net/issues/604).

	=== Another use-case ===		=== Another use-case ===

Aleksejrs: /* Selective media copying */ about notifying ServerB

2011-09-26T10:26:37Z

Selective media copying: about notifying ServerB

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:26, 26 September 2011
Line 9:		Line 9:
	* The result should (must at least if authentification was required) be marked private by default.		* The result should (must at least if authentification was required) be marked private by default.
	* It should be possible for the result to have a visible reference to its source.		* It should be possible for the result to have a visible reference to its source.
			* ServerB may be notified of the copying, so that it can link to the result, if it chooses to.

	=== Another use-case ===		=== Another use-case ===